Skip to main content

Table 2 Selected characteristics of women

From: Relative labor supply in intermarriage

 

Immigrant

Native

Selected characteristics

Intermarriage

Immigrant marriage

Intermarriage

Native marriage

Number of Obs.1

3,976 (18.2%)

17,833 (81.8%)

Working hours per weekday:

0

34.3%

44.7%

29.8%

27.3%

8-10

28.6%

25.3%

34.5%

32.5%

11-12

4.1%

1.7%

4.8%

5.3%

Marriage Pattern

870

3,106

893

16,490

 

(21.9%)

(78.1%)

(5.0%)

(95.0%)

Labor hours

4.5

3.7

5.2

5.2

Partner’s labor hours

8.7

8.1

8.6

8.9

Household hours

4.0

4.9

4.0

4.0

Partner’s household hours

1.4

1.2

1.4

1.4

Years of education

12.3

10.2

12.2

12.3

Age at marriage

27.9

22.4

27.8

25.9

Duration of marriage

13.6

18.0

13.3

17.4

Years since immigration

21.9

17.9

/

/

Age at immigration

20.2

22.4

/

/

Language2 (German):

1.5

2.3

/

/

Speaking

Writing

1.9

2.8

/

/

Identity3:

    

with Germany

2.7

3.1

/

/

with Home Country

2.5

2.5

/

/

Big Five4:

    

Openness

positive***

   

Emotional stability

    

Extraversion

positive***

   

Agreeableness

negative***

   

Conscientiousness

    

Risk proclivity5:

4.1

3.0

4.1

4.2

Origin of best friend:

    

East or West Germany

701%

32.4%

91.3%

98.9%

Other country

29.9%

67.6%

8.7%

1.1%

Distribution of income:

    

Each manages money separately

17.6%

4.1%

20.5%

16.0%

I manage, partner receives portion

3.9%

9.2%

6.8%

6.1%

Partner manages, I receive portion

7.9%

11.7%

5.5%

4.1%

All money shared

62.5%

72.0%

59.2%

64.2%

Part shared, part kept separate

8.2%

3.0%

8.1%

9.6%

Final say in financial decisions:

    

Myself

6.0%

6.7%

9.3%

5.5%

Partner

11.5%

16.7%

9.3%

6.9%

Both

82.5%

76.6%

81.3%

87.7%

  1. Source: German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), unbalanced panel, years 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005.
  2. 1Those numbers refer to observations not to individuals, unweighted sample, years 1995 to 2005.
  3. 2Self-reported value measured on a scale from 1 (= very good) to 5 (= very poor).
  4. 3Self-reported value measured on a scale from 1 (= strong) to 5 (= poor).
  5. 4Values are conducted from a factor analysis; positive/negative***: significant differences between those intermarried and those who are not.
  6. 5Self-reported value measured on a scale from 1 (= highly risk averse) to 10 (= highly risk loving).