Skip to main content

Table 8 The choice of the ideal migration destination - conditional logit estimates - 24 possible destinations

From: Potential migration and subjective well-being in Europe

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)a

GDP per capita

-0.090***

-0.092**

-0.129***

-0.109**

-0.109**

-0.004

 

(0.030)

(0.039)

(0.041)

(0.045)

(0.045)

(0.049)

Unemployment rate

-0.073***

-0.064***

-0.032

-0.015

-0.015

0.022

 

(0.017)

(0.019)

(0.025)

(0.030)

(0.030)

(0.028)

Distance

-0.057

-0.058

-0.063

-0.062

-0.062

-0.224***

 

(0.081)

(0.082)

(0.083)

(0.083)

(0.083)

(0.078)

Common language

0.869***

0.867***

0.956***

0.955***

0.955***

1.039***

 

(0.168)

(0.168)

(0.139)

(0.139)

(0.139)

(0.131)

Share of migrants

0.058***

0.059***

0.056***

0.056***

0.056***

0.062***

 

(0.012)

(0.012)

(0.010)

(0.010)

(0.010)

(0.011)

Warmer country

0.106

0.106

0.122

0.121

0.121

 
 

(0.194)

(0.194)

(0.209)

(0.209)

(0.209)

 

Income tax

 

-2.881

-6.869**

-6.024**

-6.032*

-1.811

  

(2.766)

(3.075)

(3.015)

(3.100)

(3.119)

Unemployment benefit

 

0.024

0.036

0.039

0.039

0.020

  

(0.024)

(0.029)

(0.029)

(0.029)

(0.028)

Life satisfaction

  

0.275**

0.279**

0.278**

0.192*

   

(0.125)

(0.128)

(0.129)

(0.100)

Corruption

   

-0.793*

-0.789*

-0.936**

    

(0.478)

(0.474)

(0.441)

Freedom of choice

    

0.011

 
     

(0.371)

 

Destination fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Observations

265,927

265,927

203,877

203,877

203,877

203,877

Individuals

11,370

11,370

10,255

10,255

10,255

10,255

  1. Standard errors are clustered at country level *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01. acontrols for domestic GDP per capita and average life satisfaction interacted with destination dummies.