Skip to main content

Table 7 Oaxaca decomposition of the score gap between 2000 and 2009 for second-generation immigrants

From: Better migrants, better PISA results: Findings from a natural experiment

(A)

Regression OLS 2009

Regression OLS 2000

 

Coefficient

Std. errorg

Coefficient

Std. error

Female

21.56

1.57a

19.20

6.47a

Age

−15.12

1.22a

−12.56

5.05b

SEI

0.51

0.06a

0.96

0.26a

Parents ‘educationc: tertiary

2.14

2.20

4.89

14.66

Parents’ education: compulsory

−0.14

2.62

−3.75

8.87

Family structured: single

−1.74

2.54

−12.73

10.11

Family Structure: mixed

−50.72

14.07a

−6.22

14.20

Siblings (yes)

−14.10

2.31a

−9.63

12.91

Less than 100 books at home

−39.08

2.05a

−19.36

7.67b

Foreign language at home

1.35

1.81

−22.44

7.55a

Latin Switzerland

−16.35

1.98a

−27.87

9.37a

Country of origine: Germany, France, Austria, Belgium

34.60

4.43a

0.20

14.13

Country of origin: Italy, Spain, Portugal

−9.07

2.24a

−12.85

9.07

Country of origin: Albania, Kosovo, Ex Yugoslavia

−18.17

2.26a

−8.23

11.40

Country of origin: Turkey

−14.90

3.27a

−19.04

11.88

Public

−52.25

10.65a

−33.84

19.58+

School size

0.05

0.002a

0.02

0.01a

Proportion of foreign language speakers 20–40%

−22.53

1.78a

−26.94

8.11a

Proportion of foreign language speakers >40%

−32.62

3.63a

−79.71

9.91a

Community size: village

−4.77

3.87

−80.95

18.36a

Community size: small town

−8.56

2.40a

−17.77

9.24+

Community sizef: town

−3.80

2.44

−3.59

9.68

Constant

796.46

23.32a

726.92

85.27a

R2

0.24

 

0.30

 

N

2031

 

604

 

(B) Decomposition

    

Total gap

13

100%

  

Explained

1

11%

  

Unexplained

12

89%

  
  1. asignificant at 1% level
  2. bsignificant at 5% level, +significant at 10% level
  3. cReference: Both parents have secondary level education
  4. dReference: Nuclear
  5. eReference: Other
  6. fReference: City
  7. gAll standard errors account for errors’ correlations at the school level