Table 5 Rural-to-urban migrants’ labour market performance
From: Migration magnet: the role of work experience in rural–urban wage differentials
Informal | Formal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Migrant | −0.081** | −0.195 | −0.019 | −0.183 |
(0.035) | (0.135) | (0.036) | (0.162) | |
Migrant × Exp. | -- | −0.002 | -- | 0.004 |
(0.009) | (0.011) | |||
Migrant × Exp2 | -- | 0.000 | -- | −0.000 |
(0.000) | (0.000) | |||
Migrant × High Educ. | -- | 0.147* | -- | 0.077 |
(0.083) | (0.076) | |||
Migrant × Raven score | -- | 0.170 | -- | 0.075 |
(0.144) | (0.157) | |||
Experience | 0.020*** | 0.021*** | 0.023*** | 0.023*** |
(0.005) | (0.006) | (0.006) | (0.007) | |
Experience2 | −0.000*** | −0.000*** | −0.000*** | −0.000*** |
(0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | |
High education | 0.189*** | 0.149*** | 0.306*** | 0.284*** |
(0.045) | (0.052) | (0.041) | (0.047) | |
Raven test | 0.104 | 0.016 | 0.278*** | 0.250** |
(0.073) | (0.101) | (0.078) | (0.099) | |
Hours/year | −0.000*** | −0.000*** | −0.000*** | −0.000*** |
(0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | |
Married | 0.105*** | 0.102*** | 0.025 | 0.022 |
(0.035) | (0.035) | (0.036) | (0.036) | |
Indigenous | −0.058 | −0.053 | 0.008 | 0.008 |
(0.068) | (0.068) | (0.071) | (0.071) | |
Female | −0.160*** | −0.160*** | −0.068 | −0.070 |
(0.046) | (0.046) | (0.044) | (0.044) | |
HH head | 0.007 | 0.013 | 0.057 | 0.055 |
(0.042) | (0.042) | (0.047) | (0.047) | |
HH size | −0.004 | −0.004 | −0.010** | −0.010** |
(0.004) | (0.004) | (0.004) | (0.004) | |
Constant | 3.318*** | 3.372*** | 3.796*** | 3.860*** |
(0.170) | (0.178) | (0.164) | (0.174) | |
State dummies | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Industry dummies | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Occup. dummies | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 1594 | 1594 | 1129 | 1129 |
R2 | 0.307 | 0.310 | 0.480 | 0.481 |