Income, amenities and negative attitudes

Table 10 Robustness test I: structural estimation including interaction terms—all refugees

	Income stayers		Income movers		Quality of life/cost of moving
	(1)		(2)		(3)
Uncorrelated errors
Neg. attitudes	−0.53		−0.70	***	−5.45	***
Neg. attitudes	(0.35)		(0.19)		(2.01)
% refugees	3.18	***	−1.53		30.06	***
% refugees	(1.16)		(1.26)		(5.49)
Neg. att. * % refugees	−0.19		4.45		−114.32	***
Neg. att. * % refugees	(2.76)		(3.09)		(41.31)
Correlated errors—correlation: 0.25
Neg. attitudes	−0.21		−0.66	***	−5.20	***
Neg. attitudes	(0.26)		(0.26)		(1.70)
% refugees	3.55	**	−2.54		27.74	***
% refugees	(1.79)		(1.98)		(4.67)
Neg. att. * % refugees	−4.09		5.25		−114.77	***
Neg. att. * % refugees	(3.72)		(4.77)		(36.17)
Correlated errors—correlation: 0.50
Neg. attitudes	−0.32		−0.86	***	−4.65	***
Neg. attitudes	(0.26)		(0.28)		(1.43)
% refugees	8.00	***	−3.62	*	25.14	***
% refugees	(0.98)		(1.92)		(3.88)
Neg. att. * % refugees	−5.70	***	8.39	*	−102.49	***
Neg. att. * % refugees	(1.69)		(4.45)		(30.15)

The three structural regressions (one for each assumed correlation of residuals) have the same controls and covariates as the regression in Table 4. Standard errors clustered at the labour market area level displayed under the coefficients. In column (3), each explanatory variable is defined as the differences in values between the variable at placement and the variable at the target municipality
*Significant at 10 %; **significant at 5 %; and ***significant at the 1 % level