|
Effect of attitudes
|
No correlation
|
Correlation = 0.5
|
|
Stayers’ income
|
Movers’ income
|
Quality of life
|
Stayers’ income
|
Movers’ income
|
Quality of life
|
|
All workers
|
0.00
|
−0.07
|
−0.57
|
−0.04
|
−0.02
|
−0.49
|
|
Low educated
|
0.00
|
−0.06
|
−0.56
|
−0.05
|
−0.07
|
−0.49
|
|
Well educated
|
−0.12
|
−0.05
|
−0.60
|
−0.07
|
−0.04
|
−0.49
|
|
Women
|
−0.08
|
−0.06
|
−0.66
|
−0.03
|
−0.03
|
−0.54
|
|
Men
|
0.00
|
−0.03
|
−0.48
|
−0.06
|
−0.02
|
−0.43
|
|
Developed countries
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
Effect of networks
|
No correlation
|
Correlation = 0.5
|
|
Stayers’ income
|
Movers’ income
|
Quality of life
|
Stayers’ income
|
Movers’ income
|
Quality of life
|
|
All workers
|
0.16
|
0.00
|
1.47
|
0.30
|
−0.04
|
1.23
|
|
Low educated
|
0.16
|
0.00
|
1.45
|
0.29
|
−0.17
|
1.22
|
|
Well educated
|
0.00
|
0.13
|
1.53
|
0.39
|
−0.02
|
1.25
|
|
Women
|
0.00
|
−0.04
|
1.31
|
0.27
|
−0.04
|
1.09
|
|
Men
|
0.34
|
0.10
|
1.65
|
0.34
|
−0.04
|
1.38
|
|
Developed countries
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.50
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.32
|
- Total effect (combined direct and indirect effects) in a municipality with average attitudes and networks, taking into account that the average municipality for stayers is different than the average municipality for movers
