Income, amenities and negative attitudes

Table 3 Heckman estimation of the probability of staying where placed and the effect on the income of stayers correcting for the selection bias

	Income of stayer		Prob (stay)
Negative attitudes towards immigration	−0.16	***	−0.66	***
Negative attitudes towards immigration	(0.06)		(0.04)
Share of refugees	−0.49	**	8.25	***
Share of refugees	(0.24)		(0.14)
Well educated	0.18	***	−0.11	***
Well educated	(0.01)		(0.01)
Age	0.25	***	0.01	***
Age	(0.00)		(0.00)
Age 2	0.00	***	0.00	***
Age 2	(0.00)		(0.00)
Woman	−0.28	***	0.05	***
Woman	(0.01)		(0.01)
Married/cohabitant	0.02		0.17	***
Married/cohabitant	(0.02)		(0.01)
Open unemployment	−0.07	***	0.01	**
Open unemployment	(0.01)		(0.00)
Municipal tax rate	0.02	**	−0.10	***
Municipal tax rate	(0.01)		(0.01)
Population	−0.01		0.48	***
Population	(0.03)		(0.02)
Latitude			−0.15	***
Latitude			(0.02)
Average minimum temperature in winter			0.13	***
Average minimum temperature in winter			(0.00)
Fixed and year effects	Yes		Yes
Observations	155,223

Regional fixed effects at the county level. Standard errors clustered at the labour market area level displayed under the coefficients
*Significant at 10 %; **significant at 5 %; and ***significant at the 1 % level