Skip to main content

Table 3 Heckman estimation of the probability of staying where placed and the effect on the income of stayers correcting for the selection bias

From: Income, amenities and negative attitudes

  Income of stayer Prob (stay)
Negative attitudes towards immigration −0.16 *** −0.66 ***
(0.06)   (0.04)  
Share of refugees −0.49 ** 8.25 ***
(0.24)   (0.14)  
Well educated 0.18 *** −0.11 ***
(0.01)   (0.01)  
Age 0.25 *** 0.01 ***
(0.00)   (0.00)  
Age 2 0.00 *** 0.00 ***
(0.00)   (0.00)  
Woman −0.28 *** 0.05 ***
(0.01)   (0.01)  
Married/cohabitant 0.02   0.17 ***
(0.02)   (0.01)  
Open unemployment −0.07 *** 0.01 **
(0.01)   (0.00)  
Municipal tax rate 0.02 ** −0.10 ***
(0.01)   (0.01)  
Population −0.01   0.48 ***
(0.03)   (0.02)  
Latitude    −0.15 ***
   (0.02)  
Average minimum temperature in winter    0.13 ***
   (0.00)  
Fixed and year effects Yes   Yes  
Observations 155,223    
  1. Regional fixed effects at the county level. Standard errors clustered at the labour market area level displayed under the coefficients
  2. *Significant at 10 %; **significant at 5 %; and ***significant at the 1 % level