Employment chances of immigrants and their children in Germany: does sense of personal control matter?

Table 4 Estimates of determinants of the locus of control

γ	(1)	(2)
Age	0, 04**	0, 04**
	(0.03, 0.04)	(0.03, 0.04)
Gender	−0.03	−0.04
	(−0.15, 0.08)	(−0.16, 0.07)
Religion important	−0.03	−0.04
	(−0.17, 0.1)	(−0.17, 0.10)
Low education in 1999	−0.03	−0.02
	(−0.17, 0)	(−0.16, 0.12)
High education in 1999	0.16	0.17
	(−0.02, 0.35)	(−0.02, 0.35)
Father highly educated	0	−0.01
	(−0.19, 0.19)	(−0.20, 0.18)
Mother highly educated	0, 35**	0, 34**
	(0.11, 0.59)	(0.10, 0.58)
In education in 1999	0, 22**	0, 15**
	(0.05, 0.37)	(0.00, 0.30)
Immigrant	−0, 8**
	(−1.38, −0.18)
Second generation	−0.23
	(−0.44, 0)
Turkish immigrant		−0, 55**
		(−1.72, −0.39)
Central European immigrant		−0.19
		(−0.76, 0.38)
EU 15 immigrant		−0.6
		(−1.39, 0.16)
Turkish second generation		−0, 55**
		(−0.86, −0.22)
Central European second generation		0.02
		(−0.37, 0.42)
EU15 second generation		−0.22
		(−0.61, 0.15)
German second generation		−0.12
		(−0.39, 0.15)
Immigrant foreign language spoken at home		−0.4
		(−0.97, 0.18)
Sedond generation foreign language spoken at home		−0.1
		(−0.74, 0.53)
Time stayed in Germany	0, 04**	0.03
	(0.00, 0.07)	(−0.00, 0.07)

Note: 95 % Bayesian confidence intervals in brackets. These intervals contain 95 % of the posterior probability. If this interval contains 0 the effect measured by the parameter estimate is insignificant
**Significance at the 95 % confidence level