Skip to main content

Table 9 Migration probability by destination type (multinomial logit), base model. Full results

From: Education, job insecurity and the within country migration of couples

 

Major City

Urban

Rural

(1)

(2)

(3)

Power couple

1.023**

−0.404

−0.101

(0.223)

(0.282)

(0.389)

Male-power couple

1.060**

−0.261

−0.192

(0.243)

(0.308)

(0.453)

Female-power couple

0.475*

0.352

0.035

(0.222)

(0.201)

(0.326)

Origin—major city

−0.529**

−0.887**

−0.782**

(0.162)

(0.177)

(0.278)

Origin—rural

−0.681**

−0.602**

0.212

(0.260)

(0.221)

(0.301)

Age (male)

0.051

0.183*

0.085

(0.089)

(0.090)

(0.152)

Age2 (male)

−0.001

−0.003*

−0.001

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.002)

Age (female)

−0.045

−0.012

0.235

(0.095)

(0.092)

(0.181)

Age2 (female)

0.000

−0.000

−0.004

(0.001)

(0.001)

(0.002)

Over-education (female)

0.007

0.389*

0.177

(0.156)

(0.165)

(0.243)

Over-education (male)

−0.368*

0.205

0.032

(0.154)

(0.157)

(0.236)

Dependent children

−0.113

0.017

−0.048

(0.162)

(0.171)

(0.254)

Foreign

0.341*

−0.297

−0.340

(0.155)

(0.192)

(0.275)

Home ownership

−1.438**

−1.540**

−1.034**

(0.159)

(0.167)

(0.230)

No. obs.

14,097

14,097

14,097

  1. Standard errors are adjusted for clustering on household identifier. HILDA Survey – Waves 2 to 9 (Pooled) standard errors reported in parenthesis, Significance levels: **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05