Skip to main content

Table 12 Impacts with and without baseline controls

From: Can public works programs reduce youth crime? Evidence from Papua New Guinea’s Urban Youth Employment Project

Variable of interest

Impact (DD), with no baseline controls (mean/se)

Impact (DD), with baseline controls (mean/se)

 

(1)

(2)

A. Social behavior associated with crime

 Hang out with friends late at night

−0.088**

−0.102**

0.036

0.052

 Best friend involved in crime last 3 months

−0.120***

−0.124***

0.050

0.047

 Gets drunk often (1 or more times per week)

−0.023

−0.034

0.072

0.071

 Chews betel nut

−0.030

−0.036

0.044

0.045

B. Aggressive behavior/violence

 Friends have been involved in fights or robberies

−0.159***

−0.169***

0.055

0.051

 Used threat or force with somebody

−0.127***

−0.122***

0.038

0.038

 Have been attacked and fought back

−0.148***

−0.142***

0.057

0.05

 Damaged somebody’s property for fun/joke

−0.060**

−0.056*

0.030

0.030

C. Specific criminal activities (last 6 months)

 Involved in stealing

−0.032

−0.020

0.045

0.042

 Involved in assault (physical or verbal)

0.003

0.020

0.054

0.053

 Involved in alcohol-related crime

−0.060

−0.048

0.046

0.045

 Involved in trespassing

0.040

0.040

0.036

0.035

D. Being a victim of specific criminal activities (last 6 months)

 Victim of stealing

−0.020

−0.028

0.057

0.057

 Victim of assault (physical or verbal)

−0.063

−0.062

0.057

0.05

 Victim of alcohol-related crime

−0.064

−0.049

0.048

0.047

 Victim of trespassing

0.069*

0.083**

0.039

0.039

  1. Note: baseline controls include age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education, HH size, living conditions, individual employment status (if ever had a waged job, if informally employed). Significance level: ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.1. The sample size is 338 for treatments and 249 for controls. Source: authors’ estimates