Skip to main content

Table 7 Sample balance (2013 baseline data)—controls (followed up) vs. controls (not followed up)

From: Can public works programs reduce youth crime? Evidence from Papua New Guinea’s Urban Youth Employment Project

Variable of interest

Controls (mean/sd)

Treatments (mean/sd)

Difference (mean/se)

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

Individual’s basic characteristics

 Age

23.84

24.70

−0.86***

(5.02)

(4.85)

(0.27)

 Male (1 if male, 0 if female)

0.58

0.63

−0.05*

(0.50)

(0.48)

(0.03)

 Married

0.40

0.37

0.03

(0.49)

(0.48)

(0.03)

 Years (grades) of education completed

8.59

9.32

−0.73***

(3.01)

(2.81)

(0.16)

Individual’s household characteristics

 Household size

8.38

9.29

−0.91***

(4.18)

(4.46)

(0.24)

N of females in a household

3.78

4.09

−0.31**

(2.29)

(2.64)

(0.14)

N of males (16+) in paid work

1.15

1.18

−0.03

(1.11)

(1.20)

(0.06)

 Dwelling has floors made of concrete

0.10

0.06

0.04***

(0.30)

(0.24)

(0.02)

 Dwelling has floors made of wood

0.87

0.90

−0.04**

(0.34)

(0.30)

(0.02)

Individual’s employment characteristics

 Never had a waged (formal) job

0.69

0.79

−0.10***

(0.46)

(0.41)

(0.02)

 If earned money through informal job/self-employment last month

0.28

0.36

−0.08***

(0.45)

(0.48)

(0.03)

 If searched for a paid job last month

0.25

0.33

−0.07***

(0.44)

(0.47)

(0.03)

N of observations

569

743

 
  1. Note: significance level: ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.1. Source: authors’ estimates