Table 11 Female quantile regression coefficients from pooled Mincer income regressions

From: Just like a woman? New comparative evidence on the gender income gap across Eastern Europe and Central Asia

	Percentile
	0.10	0.25	0.33	0.50 (median)	0.67	0.75	0.90
Kazakhstan
Female	0	− 0.353***	− 0.241***	0	− 0.230***	− 0.263***	− 0.252***
Female	[0.054]	[0.080]	[0.064]	[0.044]	[0.044]	[0.050]	[0.060]
Macedonia
Female	− 0.182**	− 0.182***	− 0.200***	− 0.166***	− 0.190***	− 0.213***	− 0.128***
Female	[0.089]	[0.037]	[0.037]	[0.046]	[0.040]	[0.036]	[0.044]
Moldova
Female	− 0.093	− 0.076	0	0.000***	0	− 0.494	− 0.421***
Female	[0.069]	[0.072]	[0.000]	[0.000]	[0.000]	[0.600]	[0.103]
Serbia
Female	0	− 0.182***	− 0.266***	− 0.312***	− 0.068*	− 0.086***	− 0.190***
Female	[0.050]	[0.052]	[0.052]	[0.041]	[0.041]	[0.032]	[0.053]
Tajikistan
Female	0	0	0	0	0	− 0.549	− 0.249
Female	[0.000]	[0.000]	[0.000]	[0.000]	[0.000]	[2.774]	[0.495]
Ukraine
Female	− 0.208***	− 0.298***	− 0.294***	− 0.361***	− 0.280***	− 0.523***	0
Female	[0.054]	[0.043]	[0.044]	[0.038]	[0.036]	[0.024]	[0.017]

Notes: Observation sample sizes are as follows: Kazakhstan = 1109, Macedonia = 928, Moldova = 860, Serbia = 989, Tajikistan = 614, and Ukraine = 1033. Values in brackets are within-community correlation/clustering adjusted standard errors (Wooldridge 2010) (and therefore also (implicitly) robust (Huber 1967; White 1980)). Source: UNDP/UNICEF Social Exclusion Dataset 2010 (collected November–December 2009)
*Statistically significant at 10%; **statistically significant at 5%; ***statistically significant at 1%

Back to article page