Just like a woman? New comparative evidence on the gender income gap across Eastern Europe and Central Asia

Table 12 Overall income decompositions, sensitivity analysis: threefold

	Kazakhstan	Macedonia	Moldova	Serbia	Tajikistan	Ukraine
(i) Decomposition from females’ viewpoint, i.e., using male endowments and returns
Endowments	− 0.062**	− 0.03	0.038	− 0.070***	0.008	− 0.006
Endowments	[0.026]	[0.023]	[0.026]	[0.023]	[0.021]	[0.018]
Coefficients	0.293***	0.208***	0.201***	0.191***	0.141***	0.310***
Coefficients	[0.041]	[0.033]	[0.053]	[0.031]	[0.045]	[0.032]
Interaction	− 0.025	− 0.003	0.016	0.023	0.024	0.001
Interaction	[0.023]	[0.018]	[0.028]	[0.015]	[0.026]	[0.018]
(ii) Decomposition from males’ viewpoint, i.e., using female endowments and returns
Endowments	− 0.087***	− 0.032*	0.054*	− 0.047**	0.032	− 0.005
Endowments	[0.028]	[0.019]	[0.032]	[0.020]	[0.020]	[0.013]
Coefficients	0.268***	0.206***	0.217***	0.214***	0.164***	0.311***
Coefficients	[0.043]	[0.034]	[0.052]	[0.032]	[0.049]	[0.032]
Interaction	0.025	0.003	− 0.016	− 0.023	− 0.024	− 0.001
Interaction	[0.023]	[0.018]	[0.028]	[0.015]	[0.026]	[0.018]
N	1109	928	860	989	614	1033

Notes: Values in brackets are within-community correlation/clustering adjusted standard errors (Wooldridge 2010) (and therefore also (implicitly) robust (Huber 1967; White 1980)). Source: UNDP/UNICEF Social Exclusion Dataset 2010 (collected November–December 2009)
*: statistically significant at 10 percent; **: statistically significant at 5 percent; ***: statistically significant at 1 percent