Skip to main content

Table 25 Detailed twofold income decompositions: Ukraine

From: Just like a woman? New comparative evidence on the gender income gap across Eastern Europe and Central Asia

  Weight given to males relative to females/regression model used in determining the reference coefficients for decompositions
  0 (Oaxaca 1973) 1 (Oaxaca 1973; Blinder 1973) 0.5 (Reimers 1983) Share of males (Cotton 1988) Pooled, excl. female dummy (Neumark 1988) Pooled, incl. female dummy (Jann 2008)
  Expl. Unexpl. Expl. Unexpl. Expl. Unexpl. Expl. Unexpl. Expl. Unexpl. Expl. Unexpl.
Education − 0.029** − 0.681*** − 0.008* − 0.702*** − 0.019** − 0.691*** − 0.018** − 0.692*** − 0.015** − 0.694*** − 0.017** − 0.693***
[0.012] [0.153] [0.004] [0.158] [0.007] [0.155] [0.007] [0.156] [0.006] [0.156] [0.007] [0.156]
Potential exp − 0.010** − 0.11 0.003 − 0.123 − 0.004 − 0.116 − 0.003 − 0.117 − 0.001 − 0.119 − 0.003 − 0.117
[0.005] [0.317] [0.004] [0.319] [0.003] [0.318] [0.003] [0.318] [0.003] [0.318] [0.003] [0.318]
Sector 0.047*** − 0.119 0.007 − 0.079 0.027*** − 0.099 0.026*** − 0.098 0.037*** − 0.11 0.026*** − 0.098
[0.012] [0.090] [0.009] [0.092] [0.008] [0.091] [0.008] [0.091] [0.009] [0.091] [0.008] [0.091]
Contract status − 0.004 0.033 − 0.001 0.03 − 0.003 0.031 − 0.003 0.031 − 0.003 0.031 − 0.003 0.031
[0.004] [0.042] [0.002] [0.044] [0.003] [0.043] [0.003] [0.043] [0.003] [0.043] [0.002] [0.043]
Social security − 0.002 0.081*** 0.005 0.074*** 0.002 0.077*** 0.002 0.077*** 0.002 0.077*** 0.001 0.078***
[0.003] [0.029] [0.004] [0.027] [0.003] [0.028] [0.003] [0.028] [0.003] [0.028] [0.002] [0.028]
Location − 0.007 − 0.017* − 0.011 − 0.013 − 0.009 − 0.015* − 0.009 − 0.015 − 0.009 − 0.015* − 0.009 − 0.014
[0.005] [0.010] [0.008] [0.008] [0.007] [0.009] [0.007] [0.009] [0.007] [0.009] [0.007] [0.009]
Constant   1.123***   1.123***   1.123***   1.123***   1.123***   1.123***
  [0.368]   [0.368]   [0.368]   [0.368]   [0.368]   [0.368]
  1. Notes: Values in brackets are within-community correlation/clustering adjusted standard errors (Wooldridge 2010) (and therefore also (implicitly) robust (Huber 1967; White 1980)), computed according to Jann (2008). Source: UNDP/UNICEF Social Exclusion Dataset 2010 (collected November–December 2009)
  2. *Statistically significant at 10%; **statistically significant at 5%; ***statistically significant at 1%