Skip to main content

Table 6 The impact of alcohol regulation on mortality

From: The effectiveness and effects of alcohol regulation: evidence from India

 

Road accidents, n = 442

Firearms, n = 442

Alcohol, n = 239

Spurious liquor, n = 399

MLDA

− 0.700

 

0.080

 

− 0.104

 

0.046

 

(0.510)

 

(0.083)

 

(0.111)

 

(0.051)

 

{0.1558}

 

{0.419}

 

{0.395}

 

{0.455}

 

MLDA ≥ 21

 

8.746

 

2.119

 

− 2.850

 

7.273

 

(40.892)

 

(3.723)

 

(2.117)

 

(2.637)**

 

{0.763}

 

{0.701}

 

{0.313}

 

{0.423}

MLDA ≥ 25

 

− 22.068

 

− 3.195

 

26.153

 

− 7.965

 

(43.891)

 

(2.698)

 

(5.143)***

 

(11.910)

 

{0.605}

 

{0.241}

 

{0.213}

 

{0.691}

Prohibition

 

− 39.401

 

8.412

 

− 28.846

 

8.096

 

(44.141)

 

(5.784)

 

(6.209)***

 

(13.171)

 

{0.333}

 

{0.327}

 

{0.0299}††

 

{0.875}

R-sq

0.88

0.88

0.88

0.88

0.94

0.94

0.51

0.51

  1. All regressions include controls for the state literacy rate, the fraction of people living in urban areas, per capita GDP, the unemployment rate, the number of police per capita, and state and year fixed effects, and are weighted by state population. The omitted minimum legal drinking age is 18. Standard errors presented in parentheses are clustered by state. *Significant at 10%, **significant at 5%, ***significant at 1%. p values in braces are adjusted for small clusters using wild-t bootstrap. †p ≤ 0.1, ††p ≤ 0.05, †††p ≤ 0.01
Back to article page